found this in Advancement Committee Guide Policies and Procedures (No. 33088),
http://www.scouting.org/filest…../33088.pdf
The review should take approximately 15 minutes.
At the conclusion of the review, the board should
know whether a boy is qualified for the rank or Palm.
The Scout is asked to leave the room while the board
members discuss his achievements. The decision of the
board of review is arrived at through discussion and
must be unanimous. If members are satisfied that the
Scout is ready to advance, he is called in, congratulated,
notified as to when he will receive his recognition, and
encouraged to continue his advancement or earn the
next Palm.
If the board decides that the Scout is not ready
to advance, the candidate should be informed
and told what he has not done satisfactorily. Most
Scouts accept responsibility for not completing the
requirements properly. The members of the board
of review should specify what must be done to
rework the candidate’s weaknesses and schedule
another board of review for him. A follow-up letter
must be sent to a Scout who is turned down
for rank advancement, confirming the agreements
reached on the actions necessary for advancement.
Should the Scout disagree with the decision, the
appeal procedures should be explained to him. (See
‘‘Appealing a Decision,’’ page 33.)
After the board of review is completed, the
Scoutmaster is informed of all of the decisions that
were made by the board of review.
Remember, after a Scout satisfactorily completes
a board of review, he cannot be recognized until
that action is reported to the council service center
on an Advancement Report. A monthly report
keeps unit records current and is a good practice.
The troop scribe should also keep a record in the
Troop/Team Record Book
Scout master and use by other boards of review.
for easy reference by the